blythefamily

U.S. Diplomacy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading online forum for serious conversation of American diplomacy and global affairs. The publication has included contributions from many prominent global affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy

Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.

Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the moment

Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.

Request Reprint. Request reprint consents here.

In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a vital intelligence difficulty in its blossoming competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from World War II might no longer supply adequate intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. monitoring abilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an audacious moonshot initiative: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a few years, U-2 objectives were delivering important intelligence, capturing images of Soviet missile setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar juncture. Competition between Washington and its competitors over the future of the international order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must make the most of its world-class private sector and adequate capability for innovation to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence neighborhood must harness the nation's sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The combination of expert system, particularly through big language models, uses groundbreaking chances to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the shipment of faster and more appropriate assistance to decisionmakers. This technological revolution includes considerable disadvantages, nevertheless, especially as enemies exploit similar developments to uncover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States need to challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to safeguard itself from enemies who may use the technology for visualchemy.gallery ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security community, satisfying the promise and handling the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a willingness to alter the way companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the capacity of AI while reducing its fundamental dangers, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a quickly evolving international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently communicate to the American public, and to populations and partners around the globe, how the nation intends to fairly and safely use AI, in compliance with its laws and values.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's potential to transform the intelligence neighborhood lies in its ability to process and analyze large quantities of data at extraordinary speeds. It can be challenging to analyze big quantities of gathered information to create time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services could leverage AI systems' pattern acknowledgment abilities to determine and alert human analysts to possible dangers, such as missile launches or military motions, or crucial worldwide developments that experts know senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would ensure that are timely, actionable, and appropriate, enabling more reliable responses to both rapidly emerging threats and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal designs, which incorporate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For instance, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence might provide a detailed view of military motions, enabling faster and more precise danger assessments and possibly brand-new ways of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise offload repetitive and time-consuming jobs to makers to focus on the most fulfilling work: creating original and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's general insights and performance. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence companies invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The capabilities of language models have grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently released o1 and o3 designs demonstrated significant development in precision and reasoning ability-and can be used to even more quickly equate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on greater amounts of non-English data might be capable of critical subtle distinctions in between dialects and comprehending the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By relying on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood could concentrate on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be tough to discover, typically struggle to get through the clearance process, and take a long period of time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available across the ideal companies, U.S. intelligence services would be able to quicker triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to choose the needles in the haystack that really matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can swiftly sift through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then verify and improve, ensuring the end products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might team up with a sophisticated AI assistant to overcome analytical issues, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collective style, improving each model of their analyses and providing completed intelligence quicker.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly got into a secret Iranian facility and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli officials, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of files and a further 55,000 files saved on CDs, including photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities positioned tremendous pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed assessments of its content and whether it pointed to an ongoing effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts several months-and numerous hours of labor-to translate each page, evaluate it by hand for pertinent content, and incorporate that details into assessments. With today's AI capabilities, the very first 2 steps in that procedure could have been achieved within days, maybe even hours, permitting experts to understand and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

Among the most interesting applications is the way AI might change how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, allowing them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would enable users to ask particular concerns and receive summed up, appropriate details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make notified decisions rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses numerous benefits, it also postures significant brand-new dangers, especially as enemies develop similar innovations. China's developments in AI, especially in computer system vision and security, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian routine, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty protections. That deficit makes it possible for massive data collection practices that have yielded data sets of tremendous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on large quantities of personal and behavioral data that can then be used for different purposes, such as surveillance and social control. The existence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software application all over the world could supply China with prepared access to bulk data, significantly bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition designs, a particular concern in countries with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security community should consider how Chinese models developed on such extensive information sets can offer China a tactical benefit.

And it is not simply China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those created by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting effective AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly budget friendly costs. Much of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian routines, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are utilizing large language designs to quickly generate and spread false and harmful material or to carry out cyberattacks. As seen with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals obstruct abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share a few of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, thus increasing the threat to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI models will become attractive targets for adversaries. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become crucial national assets that need to be safeguarded against adversaries seeking to jeopardize or control them. The intelligence neighborhood must purchase developing protected AI designs and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and continuous evaluation to secure against possible risks. These groups can utilize AI to simulate attacks, uncovering potential weaknesses and developing techniques to reduce them. Proactive procedures, including collaboration with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be necessary.

THE NEW NORMAL

These challenges can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to totally mature carries its own threats