stroijobs

1 Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be permitted to depart and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM's delayed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: employment I actually don't consider it a lot an offer. I think it's a demand to resign with an unclear promise that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months - however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some have been using the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for up to eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not describe it as a buyout. I think that's a really misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you believe of a buyout, there's normally some sort of written contract or a concrete deal to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your advice, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: employment First thing we inform them is workout severe care. There are no warranties included in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the agency's most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically offering up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of worker who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most careful because leaving earlier than meant can have major consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don't desire to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal employees that they have to return in - to work. And if they don't, then they have the choice to resign, employment and this administration is very generously offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just - in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it's designed to get folks who work really difficult to resign. I believe it's trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals's eyes due to the fact that there are no assurances. And these are individuals who like their task. They love the objective of the agency. They strive. And right now, they're dealing with really tough options, specifically if they're remote. I imply, it's really coercive.MARTIN: You state it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're somebody who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal difficulties simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be honest, is so unmatched that I believe a great deal of us are still trying to find out what to do with it. I'm not exactly sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I'm not aware of any authority that exists right now for OPM to order companies to give this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is extremely much possibly setting the phase for obstacles since I feel OPM has actually greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website terms of usage and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush due date by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its final type and might be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might differ. The authoritative record of NPR's programs is the audio record.