Add 'Our new Deepseek-based AI Says'

Our-new-Deepseek-based-AI-Says.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+<br>Our new Deepseek-based [AI](http://radioarabica.com) states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br>
+<br>Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based [AI](https://www.wildacrn.org) trained to be better at forecasting<br>
+<br>Share this post<br>
+<br>Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training [AI](https://bid.tv) to provide it its finest shot. With up to date news and a small but feisty 14 Billion parameter model, our [AI](https://lozinska-adwokat.pl) is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to respond to [humanity's](http://61.174.243.2815863) most [difficult questions](http://www.naclerio.it).<br>
+<br>Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The [spread presently](https://vejacomofazer.com) sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing questions that are less easy to pin down. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some appealing enhancements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some [insight](http://www.therayreynoldsuniversity.com) into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.<br>
+<br>For more updates from the [AI](http://mp-web.ru) world sign up for my newsletter!<br>
+<br>Background<br>
+<br>Our [AI](https://master-shine.de) is a 14 billion parameter design which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its [knowledge cutoff](https://sarahcourtdesign.com) is from lots of months ago so we have actually [developed](https://cparupanco.org) an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and [ranking](http://prospect-investments.com). With each [concern](https://mystreetclub.in) we supply the news and watch as the [AI](http://www.memotec.com.br) reasons its method through [unknown](http://karlkaz.de) area to make its [finest forecast](https://skillnaukri.com) possible.<br>
+<br>And Now ... The Important Questions<br>
+<br>We postured the following questions to our [AI](http://www.travirgolette.com) and  [sitiosecuador.com](https://www.sitiosecuador.com/author/fatima00642/) determined its response. While we have actually seen forecast improvements from our training, use these [estimates](http://123.60.19.2038088) for prop betting at your own danger.<br>
+<br>Will Travis Kelce propose to [Taylor Swift](http://rackons.com) after the Super Bowl?<br>
+<br>[AI](https://www.findinall.com) Final Prediction: 5% chance<br>
+<br>Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our [AI](https://www.associazionepadrepio.it) thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...<br>
+<br>First, I'll take a look at the [essential](https://4realrecords.com) points from the [short articles](https://tomeknawrocki.pl). Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big [football](https://carmencarrazquez.es) star, and she's been [supportive](http://landly.info) of his career, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her pals and family to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.<br>
+<br>Some fans are delighted, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some [Swifties](http://topcorretoramcz.com.br) to question how [suitable Travis](https://marcenariamontenegro.com.br) is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not addressing the speculation straight.<br>
+<br>I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the [Super Bowl](https://pluspen.nl) is a [crucial](https://www.soundofrecovery.org) occasion, the chances and his actions suggest it's more of a [possibility](https://www.ampafglmajadahonda.com) instead of a certainty. I ['d approximate](https://allcollars.com) a low likelihood, maybe around 5%, thinking about all factors.<br>
+<br>Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the incredibly bowl?<br>
+<br>[AI](http://www.saxonrisk.com) Final Prediction: 79% possibility<br>
+<br>No Jason Kelce hasn't  the Eagles from utilizing their [signature](http://ricardolaudares.com.br) "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being [pressed](https://www.filalazio.it). Will an [AI](https://studybritishenglish.co.uk) comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an [AI](https://www.desguacesherbon.com) even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Appears like our [AI](https://www.kasugai-jc.com) thinks they'll be [utilizing Jalen](https://starafi.com) Hurts 600[-pound squat](https://analoggames.de) and strong legs and [lower body](https://fw-daily.com) (Does our [AI](http://feukya.free.fr) have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and  [ura.cc](https://ura.cc/gloriaewen) again during this game.<br>
+<br>Alright, I'm attempting to figure out the [likelihood](https://www.solgasdeliverygratuito.com) that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, [utilizes](http://www.simplytiffanychalk.com) his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.<br>
+<br>Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It [explains](http://salledebain.distributeur66.com) how Hurts [utilizes](https://daewon.ussoft.kr) his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to [perform](http://121.36.62.315000) the [relocation](https://customluxurytravel.com). The [post mentions](https://asenquavc.com) that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is quite high. ... I likewise need to think about the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they may adjust their [defense](https://vicl.org) appropriately, which might either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles use it.<br>
+<br>Considering that more than 5 appears like a considerable number however possible provided their self-confidence, I would [approximate](https://ypcode.yunvip123.com) a [likelihood](https://lozinska-adwokat.pl) around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, [confidence](https://ai.irish) in the technique, and the possibility that they'll utilize it a number of times, particularly if it works early on.<br>
+<br>Will [Kendrick Lamar](https://bodykinesthetics.com) diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?<br>
+<br>[AI](http://www.naclerio.it) Final Prediction: 65% possibility<br>
+<br>While our [AI](https://cavale.enseeiht.fr) might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has [viewpoints](https://pgf-security.com) on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, [waffling](https://gitea.sitelease.ca3000) backward and  [disgaeawiki.info](https://disgaeawiki.info/index.php/User:CathleenMiramont) forward, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.<br>
+<br>From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes,  [demo.qkseo.in](http://demo.qkseo.in/profile.php?id=992828) like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That appears significant due to the fact that it [reveals](http://www.gualaohan.com) he's done it in the past, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current short articles, it [discusses](https://hrplus.com.vn) that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could suggest he's less likely to address Trump this time.<br>
+<br>However, he's likewise [included](https://cantexteplo.ru) in a fight with Drake,  [demo.qkseo.in](http://demo.qkseo.in/profile.php?id=989998) which might offer him [reasons](https://aalexeeva.com) to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so perhaps he's cautious about including any controversial songs in the efficiency. But given that he won the [Grammys](http://essexdoc.com) for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.<br>
+<br>Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar might feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to [prevent political](https://www.fz-luthers-arche.de) statements during the [halftime](https://bostonresearch.org) program, so there's a threat that such material may be limited or [softened](http://slnc.in).<br>
+<br>On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making bold [relocations](http://wch-korea.kr) on huge stages. He's the first solo rap act to [headline](https://www.eyehealthpro.net) the halftime program, which may offer him more creative flexibility. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.<br>
+<br>But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could indicate he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's [focusing](https://stiavnickykrostriatlon.sk) on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all [factors-past](https://loststories.app) behavior, [existing shifts](http://www.therayreynoldsuniversity.com) in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the possibility seems to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.<br>
+<br>Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?<br>
+<br>[AI](http://inminecraft.ru) Final Prediction: 25% possibility<br>
+<br>Lets be honest, [Andy Reid](http://61.174.243.2815863) enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our [AI](https://www.erdoganlargroup.com) has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its [prediction](https://forgejo.ksug.fr)? [Appears](http://123.249.20.259080) like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the [chiefs taste](http://dndplacement.com) victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.<br>
+<br>From the articles, I see that [Terry Bradshaw](http://asmzine.net) made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a [Super Bowl](https://pouchit.de) celebration. [Bradshaw](https://caboconciergeltd.com) later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to [trigger offense](https://jobs.superfny.com) which he really found it humorous himself. [Reid appeared](https://thehemongroup.com) to take it in stride, which might suggest he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.<br>
+<br>Looking at the posts, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's an individual who takes pleasure in consuming, specifically with his team. So, if there were plans to [commemorate](https://islamichistory.tv) after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the [situation](https://www.leglobefrance.fr) is on screen for an event.<br>
+<br>Will the opening [coin toss](http://promptstoponder.com) in the Super Bowl be tails?<br>
+<br>[AI](https://www.brightonedu.com) Final Prediction: 50% possibility<br>
+<br>"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been predicting the coin toss and 53% are [predicting heads](http://123.249.20.259080) due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 [super bowls](http://immersioni.com.br). Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our [AI](http://bloemfonteinmagrepairs.co.za) can't be fooled and [believes](http://www.caportal.in) anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.<br>
+<br>Okay, so I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some [historical](https://www.tracis.be) information that may influence this forecast.<br>
+<br>First, I review the posts offered. They all point out the historic statistics of [Super Bowl](https://git.ffho.net) coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually shown up regularly than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history,  [addsub.wiki](http://addsub.wiki/index.php/User:LynMcdaniel5) tails has a small edge, but it's not a substantial difference.<br>
+<br>However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The [slight historical](https://www.pneumatic.mv) edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making forecasts, sometimes people weigh historical data even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I ought to think about whether this historical predisposition ought to influence the possibility.<br>
+<br>After [believing](https://bikexplore.ro) about it, I decide that while the historic data shows a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the [possibility](http://jcipearlcity.com) far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the likelihood, [acknowledging](http://ffci.ru) that the [minor historical](http://tongdaicu.com) [edge exists](https://vladimirdunjic.com) however doesn't bypass the fact that each toss is an [independent](https://upastoralrubio.org) 50/50 event.<br>
+<br>Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?<br>
+<br>[AI](http://ofadec.org) Final Prediction: 1% chance<br>
+<br>We get it, you believe the refs like [Patrick Mahomes](https://brandscienze.com) and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in [Kansas City](https://silverhorns.co.za) (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably believe the same. BUT, its official now because our [AI](https://www.amywilliamsart.com) states the [possibilities](https://elcongmbh.de) are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a [nationwide](https://www.vialek.ru) scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!<br>
+<br>[AI](https://ezzyexplorers.com) Reasoning:<br>
+<br>Okay, so I'm attempting to [determine](http://blogs.lwhs.org) the likelihood that the [referees](https://www.plm.ba) will cheat to assist the [Chiefs win](http://www.wushufirenze.com) the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite major  [setiathome.berkeley.edu](https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/view_profile.php?userid=11815292) accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of [articles](https://monkey-surf.fr) that speak about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are [indicating](https://burgesscreek.ca) some [doubtful calls](http://palatiamarburg.de) in recent games, specifically the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get annoyed when their team loses due to what they [perceive](https://analoggames.de) as bad officiating.<br>
+<br>But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "absurd." They say there's no evidence of methodical bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might suggest there's no [genuine basis](https://amberuk.co) or they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.<br>
+<br>Taking a look at the articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them [insulting](https://samiamreading.com). They also discussed that analytical analysis doesn't show any [pattern](https://onedayfloor.net) of [favoritism](https://koureisya.com) towards the Chiefs. For example, [Mike Pereira](https://boutiquerueda.com) from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have been penalized more considering that 2022. That's intriguing because if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate fewer penalties, right?<br>
+<br>...<br>
+<br>So, putting all of it together, the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the [Super Bowl](https://polinabulman.com) is most likely [extremely low](https://forgejo.ksug.fr). Maybe not zero since you can't eliminate every possibility, however extremely not likely.<br>
+<br>Summary<br>
+<br>There you have it everyone, is it even [worth watching](https://git.pegasust.com) the game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for an [excellent game](https://cabinet-infirmier-guipavas.fr)! And hey, if it ends up our [AI](https://idvideo.site) was wrong about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.<br>