U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading forum for major discussion of American diplomacy and global affairs. The publication has included contributions from many leading international affairs specialists.
More Resources
- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI
ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its very first Chief Risk Officer.
- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI
How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage
Anne Neuberger
-.
Copy Link Copied.
Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai.
Copy
Gift Link Copied.
This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.
Create Citation Copied.
Chicago MLA APSA APA.
Chicago Cite not available at the minute.
MLA Cite not available at the minute.
APSA Cite not available at the minute.
APA Cite not available at the minute
Download PDF.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.
Request Reprint.
Request reprint authorizations here.
In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a critical intelligence difficulty in its blossoming competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from World War II could no longer supply adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. surveillance abilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an adventurous moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were providing crucial intelligence, catching images of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.
Today, the United States stands at a similar point. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the worldwide order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must benefit from its world-class economic sector and ample capacity for innovation to outcompete its adversaries. The U.S. intelligence community must harness the nation's sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The combination of synthetic intelligence, especially through large language models, offers groundbreaking chances to improve intelligence operations and analysis, making it possible for the delivery of faster and more appropriate assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation comes with considerable drawbacks, however, especially as foes make use of similar developments to reveal and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States need to challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to protect itself from opponents who might utilize the technology for ill, and initially to use AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.
For the U.S. national security neighborhood, fulfilling the pledge and handling the hazard of AI will require deep technological and cultural modifications and a desire to alter the method companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the capacity of AI while reducing its inherent dangers, ensuring that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a quickly developing worldwide landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the country means to fairly and safely use AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.
MORE, BETTER, FASTER
AI's capacity to reinvent the intelligence neighborhood lies in its capability to procedure and examine vast quantities of information at unmatched speeds. It can be challenging to examine large amounts of collected information to produce time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services could utilize AI systems' pattern recognition abilities to determine and alert human experts to prospective threats, such as rocket launches or military motions, or crucial global advancements that experts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers have an interest in. This ability would ensure that important warnings are timely, actionable, and pertinent, permitting more effective responses to both quickly emerging threats and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal designs, which incorporate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For circumstances, using AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence could supply a detailed view of military motions, allowing faster and more accurate risk evaluations and potentially new methods of delivering details to policymakers.
Intelligence analysts can also unload recurring and lengthy jobs to devices to concentrate on the most satisfying work: creating initial and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's general insights and productivity. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has paid off. The capabilities of language models have grown increasingly advanced and accurate-OpenAI's just recently released o1 and o3 models showed considerable progress in accuracy and reasoning ability-and can be utilized to even more quickly equate and sum up text, audio, and video files.
Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on higher quantities of non-English information could be capable of critical subtle distinctions in between dialects and understanding the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By counting on these tools, the intelligence community could focus on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be difficult to discover, typically struggle to get through the clearance process, and take a very long time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available across the ideal firms, U.S. intelligence services would be able to more rapidly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to select out the needles in the haystack that actually matter.
The value of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can quickly sort through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and traditional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that experts can then confirm and fine-tune, ensuring the last products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might partner with an innovative AI assistant to resolve analytical issues, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, improving each version of their analyses and delivering finished intelligence quicker.
Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli officials, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of files and a more 55,000 files saved on CDs, consisting of pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials put tremendous pressure on intelligence specialists to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it indicated a continuous effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these professionals several months-and numerous hours of labor-to equate each page, evaluate it by hand for relevant material, and incorporate that details into assessments. With today's AI capabilities, the first 2 steps in that procedure could have been achieved within days, possibly even hours, allowing experts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.
One of the most fascinating applications is the method AI could change how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would permit users to ask specific questions and receive summed up, relevant details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make informed decisions quickly.
BRAVE NEW WORLD
Although AI offers various benefits, it likewise presents considerable brand-new threats, especially as foes develop comparable innovations. China's improvements in AI, particularly in computer system vision and surveillance, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian program, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit enables massive data collection practices that have actually yielded information sets of tremendous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on large quantities of individual and behavioral data that can then be used for various purposes, such as security and social control. The existence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software application around the world might provide China with prepared access to bulk information, significantly bulk images that can be used to train facial acknowledgment models, a specific issue in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security community should think about how Chinese designs built on such substantial data sets can offer China a strategic advantage.
And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly budget-friendly costs. A number of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are utilizing large language models to quickly generate and spread out incorrect and destructive content or to conduct cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, wavedream.wiki and Russia will have every reward to share a few of their AI advancements with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, asteroidsathome.net Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, consequently increasing the danger to the United States and its allies.
The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI models will end up being appealing targets for adversaries. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become important nationwide properties that should be safeguarded against adversaries looking for to compromise or manipulate them. The intelligence neighborhood must purchase establishing safe AI designs and in establishing requirements for "red teaming" and continuous evaluation to secure against possible threats. These teams can utilize AI to mimic attacks, revealing potential weaknesses and establishing techniques to mitigate them. Proactive steps, consisting of cooperation with allies on and investment in counter-AI innovations, will be vital.
THE NEW NORMAL
These challenges can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI innovations to completely mature brings its own threats
1
Spy Vs. AI
Abbey Imlay edited this page 2 months ago