One Australian business has actually dissuaded personnel from utilizing the innovation, ratemywifey.com others are scrambling for suggestions on its cybersecurity implications - while federal government ministers are prompting care.
But others have welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, requiring Australia to follow China's lead in developing effective yet less energy-intensive AI innovation.
In the days considering that the Chinese business introduced its R1 artificial intelligence design and publicly launched its chatbot and app, it has upended the AI market.
- Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news e-mail
Several international industry leaders saw their market values drop after the launch, as DeepSeek showed AI might be developed using a portion of the expense and processing required to train models such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.
Its arrival may indicate a new industry shift, asteroidsathome.net but for government and hb9lc.org company, the effect is unclear. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught governments and businesses by surprise as personnel began to attempt out the new AI innovation, a minimum of for the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.
Business as typical
A representative for Telstra said the business had "a strenuous procedure to evaluate all AI tools, abilities, and utilize cases in our business", consisting of a list of authorized generative AI tools, and guidelines on how to utilize them.
For now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not authorized and its use is not encouraged (although it's not formally blocked).
"Our preferred partner is MS Copilot, and we're presenting 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our workers."
Other business sought immediate recommendations on whether DeepSeek must be adopted.
Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, said consumers had currently approached the business for guidance on whether the technology was safe.
"That's no surprise, because it seems the entire world has been in a bit of a DeepSeek frenzy - both the economically and market likely and those with the security lens," Mansted said.
DeepSeek and government
CyberCX today took the unusual step of quickly issuing guidance suggesting organisations, including government departments and disgaeawiki.info those keeping info, strongly consider restricting access to DeepSeek on work devices.
"We understand that there is no proactive policy here from government ... We've been down this road in the past," Mansted said. "We have actually had disputes about TikTok, about Chinese surveillance cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we always act after the truth, not before the reality ... Here, especially because the risks are around compromise of delicate info, in terms of any info that you put into this AI assistant: it's going directly to China.
"We believed we needed to act much faster this time."
Under federal AI policy carried out in September 2024, agencies have till the end of February 2025 to release transparency documents about their use of AI.
But understanding who makes choices on the specific usage of DeepSeek in the federal government has proved challenging. The attorney general of the United States's department, which made the decision to prohibit TikTok utilize on government gadgets, referred questions to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.
Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its main policy and did not provide a reaction by the time of publication.
Familiar arguments ...
A few of the reaction in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have been calls to prohibit the innovation, amidst concern over how the Chinese federal government may access user information - an echo of the days Huawei was banned from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more just recently, of the argument over banning TikTok.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China federal government, said this week that Australia "can not continue the present technique of reacting to each new tech advancement". It called for a tech technique covering AI that included investing in sovereign AI abilities.
The industry minister, Ed Husic, said on Tuesday it was too early to make a decision on whether DeepSeek was a security risk.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
"If there is anything that provides a danger in the national interest, we will constantly keep an open mind and see what takes place. I think it's too early to leap to conclusions on that," he said. "But, again, if we need to act, then accountable federal governments do."
He worried that Australia is "in the final phases" of planning its reaction and would establish its own regulative settings.
"The US is flagging their technique. The EU has theirs. Canada likewise will have a different method. And our regional partners too are looking at this," he said.
1
As DeepSeek Upends the aI Industry, one Group is Urging Australia to Embrace The Opportunity
Abbey Imlay edited this page 2 months ago